Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 23, 2012, 09:05:19 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
642171
Posts in
9127
Topics by
3369
Members Latest Member:
-
SlowWestVulture
Most online today:
80
- most online ever:
494
(Jul 01, 2007, 02:59:53 PM)
LPTJ
|
Last Plane Forums
|
Departure Lounge
| Topic:
SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
7
8
9
...
13
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances) (Read 6508 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
fishjim
Registered user
Posts: 1720
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #75 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 11:47:35 AM »
Quote from: Ignatius on Jan 27, 2012, 11:20:38 AM
Even if that's not my objective, it's almost always the automatic thing that happens. I wouldn't say it's super comfortable, but nothing else is as possible as sleep. Same thing with buses. In transport, I am as a babe in a mother's arms
I knew we had more in common than movie theaters, Iggy. I'm an all-terrain sleeper, too.
Logged
Just wandering the countryside clearing caves.
Ignatius
Registered user
Posts: 7026
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #76 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 11:56:17 AM »
Quote from: elpollodiablo on Jan 27, 2012, 10:32:50 AM
Having a daughter for this short time has already opened my eyes a bit wider re: our culture's disgusting gender bias. Just been noticing that in all of the literature on baby care that the only pronouns used are male ones. When D was pregnant and people would ask us boy or girl, we'd say "A girl! We both wanted a girl." And almost invariably, our interlocutor would go, "
Really?
" Yes fucking really what the fuck is your problem.
If you like girls so much why don't you marry one?
While it's not as troubling as your experience, I'm pretty amazed that my stepmom continues to refer to the dog as a "he," though Breifne's been a lady dog for the full six years she's been alive.
Logged
fishjim
Registered user
Posts: 1720
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #77 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 01:49:09 PM »
I know exactly what you mean, Nick. K and I both wanted girls, and we got 'em, but I feel guilty every time I admit that.
Logged
Just wandering the countryside clearing caves.
Greg Nog
Registered user
Posts: 21251
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #78 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 01:52:41 PM »
A couple I know was reallllly hoping to have a girl, and ended up having a son instead; they called up fenster to be like, "NOOOOOO WE DON'T WANT A SON HE'S GOING TO BE AWFUL" once they found out.
But! They adapted pretty quickly, and the boy is fucking splendid!
Logged
davy
Registered user
Posts: 24642
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #79 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 01:53:45 PM »
Quote from: Nick Ink on Jan 27, 2012, 01:44:42 PM
We both wanted girls too. Both times. You're not supposed to think it, are you, but I was terrified by the idea of having sons.
I'll admit to feeling just the opposite -- not that I didn't want a girl, but that the prospect of raising one was somehow more intimidating.
Logged
The drummer IS the foundation, p3wn.
jebreject
Registered user
Posts: 26394
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #80 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 02:08:22 PM »
Quote from: Ignatius on Jan 27, 2012, 11:56:17 AM
While it's not as troubling as your experience, I'm pretty amazed that my stepmom continues to refer to the dog as a "he," though Breifne's been a lady dog for the full six years she's been alive.
Um, all dogs are boys and all cats are girls. Duh.
Logged
I've seen you pound your fist in to the earth.
peacocks
Registered user
Posts: 4092
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #81 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 02:27:37 PM »
also girls only use spoons. boys use forks and knives. <<<<<<<<real thing I thought as a babygirlchild
Logged
Quote from: diesel_powered
Nothing wrong with a little post-coital rhubarb.
davy
Registered user
Posts: 24642
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #82 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 02:51:54 PM »
I used to think people cycled through various races as they got older.
Logged
The drummer IS the foundation, p3wn.
peacocks
Registered user
Posts: 4092
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #83 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 02:55:04 PM »
that would be awesome.
Logged
Quote from: diesel_powered
Nothing wrong with a little post-coital rhubarb.
mixed cats
Registered user
Posts: 3088
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #84 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 02:57:34 PM »
Quote from: jebreject on Jan 27, 2012, 02:08:22 PM
Quote from: Ignatius on Jan 27, 2012, 11:56:17 AM
While it's not as troubling as your experience, I'm pretty amazed that my stepmom continues to refer to the dog as a "he," though Breifne's been a lady dog for the full six years she's been alive.
Um, all dogs are boys and all cats are girls. Duh.
My grandmother still calls our cats "she" because she really believes that. She is also losing it, but she thought that before.
pollo, once you start noticing the pervasiveness of maleness being the universal and femaleness (or anything else) being the other, it's very hard to block it out and it may drive you slowly insane
Logged
call me, and we'll sit down and work it out
over pancakes and orange juices
Greg Nog
Registered user
Posts: 21251
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #85 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 03:18:25 PM »
Quote from: davy on Jan 27, 2012, 02:51:54 PM
I used to think people cycled through various races as they got older.
Holy shit what scientist do we have to bribe to make this happen
Also, davy: was there the same order in all cases? Like, all black people are 45, but then they turn white at 60? Or could you be born as any of them?
Logged
peacocks
Registered user
Posts: 4092
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #86 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 03:32:44 PM »
At first I thought of it as a marble ice cream deal, or kaleidascope effect. Completely random and ever changing, every year or 5 years or 6 months.
Logged
Quote from: diesel_powered
Nothing wrong with a little post-coital rhubarb.
mountmccabe
Registered user
Posts: 2779
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #87 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 04:42:42 PM »
I have to be absolutely exhausted to fall asleep for long on an airplane; I have slept more than half an hour total maybe twice.
I slept on neither the 9 hour flight to London nor the overnight 5-hour ferry from Liverpool to Dublin where it was just my friends and I in the seated area.
I also slept on neither the 16-hour bus ride from Tucson to Mazatlan nor the one back.
Logged
You know a pancake?
davy
Registered user
Posts: 24642
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #88 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 04:55:49 PM »
Quote from: Greg Nog on Jan 27, 2012, 03:18:25 PM
Quote from: davy on Jan 27, 2012, 02:51:54 PM
I used to think people cycled through various races as they got older.
Holy shit what scientist do we have to bribe to make this happen
Also, davy: was there the same order in all cases? Like, all black people are 45, but then they turn white at 60? Or could you be born as any of them?
The latter. You could be born white, but you'd be a black adult. Latinos and Asians were in the middle somewhere? It was all about shading, I guess.
Maybe the reason I'm not racist--despite growing up in central Georgia--is that I really believed I'd be a black man someday.
Logged
The drummer IS the foundation, p3wn.
G.C.R
Registered user
Posts: 6080
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #89 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 05:52:09 PM »
My mum really wanted girls, and we always knew she'd have no problem if we were gay or anything, but recently, talking about a trans friend, Anne and I realised she'd probably be really, really upset if either of us were trans. It'd make her so sad if we weren't girls.
Logged
I think it's fair to assume we'll be inebriated and covered in bodily effluvia all weekend
G.C.R
Registered user
Posts: 6080
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #90 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 06:05:17 PM »
Ugh, I had one of those awful dinners with two women I'm friends with last night, where we went to one of those awesome sushi train places. I can easily eat six of those tiny plates at a sitting, and then I'm full but not feeling like I've overeaten. But man! These two slowly and carefully ate two, maybe three plates and that was it. I ate four and felt like a total pig, with my huge stack of plates next to their tiny ones, but I still had had barely enough to eat. It made me realise that this is why I hardly ever eat with female friends.
I wanna be all not caring about it and eating what I damn well please, but its so hard when almost all the women I know either are slender and perfect, or identify strongly as either a)having an eating disorder or b)being a Fat Person. I'm not any of those things! But I feel like people are gonna judge me as one of those things, and I'm not comfortable with that. Why does everything about food have to be so fucking difficult all the time?
Logged
I think it's fair to assume we'll be inebriated and covered in bodily effluvia all weekend
clare
Registered user
Posts: 4870
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #91 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 06:09:28 PM »
Oh wow, that's hard Grace. I've got nothing. My brain and food are still in an uneasy truce. I still over-eat, but I stuff myself with salad or steamed vegetables these days so I'm less likely to regret it the next day, or even in a few hours...
Back to the other thing...I actively wanted the big boy to be a boy. Something about the gender stuff you lot have all talked about meant I didn't much like being a girl when I was young, boys obviously have more fun. Also the really pervasive stuff these days about girls being forced to be princesses/little hookers really turned me off. I kind of wanted E to be a girl - it's hard to think about getting older, or being a grandmother with no daughters...but yeah, having sons means I get to play boy-games, or contradict their gender role stuff (though E has no dolls, he has stuffed toys, and his childcare centre has a 'home corner' which all the kids love to play in)
Logged
Even if your nether rod works on 100%, it is a good decision to give it 150% strength.
Greg Nog
Registered user
Posts: 21251
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #92 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 10:04:23 PM »
Oh man, I love those sushi conveyor belt places. I can pile up a stack of them the size of my damn torso.
This is probably not so helpful in re advice or sympathy for weight loss, other than to say that I generally do not eat much sushi because it will lead to me eating all the sushi
Logged
jm
Registered user
Posts: 4627
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #93 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 10:55:34 PM »
Quote from: Greg Nog on Jan 27, 2012, 10:04:23 PM
Oh man, I love those sushi conveyor belt places. I can pile up a stack of them the size of my damn torso.
but this is true of any kind of food, whether it comes on a plate or not, no?
Logged
His hand is holding my hands, which are rested on his knee.
Greg Nog
Registered user
Posts: 21251
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #94 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 11:14:07 PM »
This is true, but it's the stacking of empty plates at the conveyor-belt sushi restaurants that really brings home how much I'm likely to eat. I went to one once where each of the plates was color-coded according to price, but if you ordered the all-you-can-eat option, you could just grab whatever. I believe the price for that was like 40 bucks, so I went for it.
At the end of the meal, I tallied up my plates, and found I had eaten 95 dollars worth of sushi.
DEAL ACHIEVED
Logged
jm
Registered user
Posts: 4627
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #95 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 11:32:55 PM »
Quote from: Greg Nog on Jan 27, 2012, 11:14:07 PM
This is true, but it's the stacking of empty plates at the conveyor-belt sushi restaurants that really brings home how much I'm likely to eat. I went to one once where each of the plates was color-coded according to price, but if you ordered the all-you-can-eat option, you could just grab whatever. I believe the price for that was like 40 bucks, so I went for it.
At the end of the meal, I tallied up my plates, and found I had eaten 95 dollars worth of sushi.
DEAL ACHIEVED
Oh yeah $40 worth of sushi would end up inside me pretty fast.
Logged
His hand is holding my hands, which are rested on his knee.
Babar
Registered user
Posts: 3260
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #96 on:
Jan 27, 2012, 11:42:25 PM »
Quote from: mixed cats on Jan 27, 2012, 02:57:34 PM
pollo, once you start noticing the pervasiveness of maleness being the universal and femaleness (or anything else) being the other, it's very hard to block it out and it may drive you slowly insane
Even the English language does this. You have
Man
, then you have the other type called
Wo
Man
. Which is the alternative
Wo
type of Man.
I think it should be Man and Wan instead.
Logged
Oh man, I'm gonna have cause to regret this post. I know it.
fishjim
Registered user
Posts: 1720
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #97 on:
Jan 28, 2012, 04:20:24 PM »
I prefer to think Woman came first, for Womb.
Man came next, and since there was half a chromosome missing, the ruling female commune voted to drop a few letters. Originally, Man had only 3/5 of a vote, too, but that changed during Masculinism.
«
Last Edit: Jan 28, 2012, 04:22:57 PM by fishjim
»
Logged
Just wandering the countryside clearing caves.
Greg Nog
Registered user
Posts: 21251
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #98 on:
Jan 28, 2012, 04:45:27 PM »
It would be pretty bitchin' if we could revert to Woman and Wereman to differentiate between female and male.
Logged
Thermofusion
Registered user
Posts: 9508
Re: SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
«
Reply #99 on:
Jan 28, 2012, 06:15:51 PM »
Quote from: Babar on Jan 27, 2012, 11:42:25 PM
Quote from: mixed cats on Jan 27, 2012, 02:57:34 PM
pollo, once you start noticing the pervasiveness of maleness being the universal and femaleness (or anything else) being the other, it's very hard to block it out and it may drive you slowly insane
Even the English language does this. You have
Man
, then you have the other type called
Wo
Man
. Which is the alternative
Wo
type of Man.
I think it should be Man and Wan instead.
Thank you Andy Rooney
Logged
"King Shit of Fuck Mountain. See you Monday."
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
7
8
9
...
13
LPTJ
|
Last Plane Forums
|
Departure Lounge
| Topic:
SUB+AUX 'BE'+'always'+~ing VERB! (1st Wrld Annoyances)
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Last Plane Forums
-----------------------------
=> Last Plane
=> In The Earbuds
=> Departure Lounge
=> White Courtesy Phone
-----------------------------
Archives
-----------------------------
=> The Hangar
Loading...