Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
May 18, 2013, 09:39:43 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
655857
Posts in
9232
Topics by
3396
Members Latest Member:
-
vlozan86
Most online today:
21
- most online ever:
494
(Jul 01, 2007, 02:59:53 PM)
LPTJ
|
Last Plane Forums
|
Departure Lounge
| Topic:
Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
8
...
15
« previous
next »
Author
Topic: Woo-ha! Ain't science something? (Read 17944 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Good Intentions
Registered user
Posts: 13882
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #50 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 09:31:00 AM »
Well, I don't have the engineering drafts in front of me, but I think that there are a few things that factor. It can't be a problem if it's an inefficient form of generating power, since it taps into a pretty much limitless source of energy. Given that it's Japan, it would slot into a very well-coordinated national grid that covers a relatively small area, so I don't see it as an inefficient because of trouble with distribution. I gather that in the US transmitting power over long distances is a problem, but the infrastructure in Japan is far better and the distances far smaller. Also, Japan is pretty resource poor, so they don't have coal or oil to burn in large quantities, and I imagine they're sick to their stomachs of shoal.
Anyway, the projections are that the electricity generated this way would cost one sixth of the current price of electricity in Japan (so, still more than four times as expensive as South African electrility). Here's the kicker: the first one is supposed to generate the same amount of power as a mid-sized nuclear power plant (without mentioning that the technology would likely improve quite a bit after a few iterations). Now, if you ask me which I feel more comfortable with, giant space lasers beat out nuclear reactors by an embarrassing margin (hell, it beats old coal generators and aluminium smelters as well).
Logged
andronicus
Registered user
Posts: 6515
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #51 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 09:42:43 AM »
Quote from: Good Intentions on Nov 11, 2009, 09:31:00 AM
shoal
shale?
Logged
Good Intentions
Registered user
Posts: 13882
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #52 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 09:47:38 AM »
shale
Logged
YojimboMonkey
Registered user
Posts: 12034
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #53 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 10:08:45 AM »
I am in favor of giant space lasers
Logged
Anus-licking causes sepsis; if not given antibiotics within a half hour, they perish.
Dee
Registered user
Posts: 169
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #54 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 10:22:21 AM »
I feel bad for that spectacled bear on the previous page. She's probably thinking, 'Wtf, it's getting colder. Winter coat don't fail me now!' And also, 'Why are more people coming to stare at me? Leave me alone.
'
I had a poodle once who was so ashamed of getting his haircut that he would hide all sullen-like. I wonder if the bears are feeling sad without their hair.
Spectacled bears are the coolest.
Also, anyone down for a
meteor shower?
Logged
coldforge
Registered user
Posts: 11924
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #55 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 10:44:09 AM »
Quote from: andronicus on Nov 11, 2009, 09:42:43 AM
Quote from: Good Intentions on Nov 11, 2009, 09:31:00 AM
shoal
shale?
shoah
Logged
è l'era del terzo mondo.
Andrew_TSKS
Registered user
Posts: 39426
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #56 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 12:42:15 PM »
Quote from: Good Intentions on Nov 11, 2009, 09:31:00 AM
Given that it's Japan, it would slot into a very well-coordinated national grid that covers a relatively small area, so I don't see it as an inefficient because of trouble with distribution. I gather that in the US transmitting power over long distances is a problem, but the infrastructure in Japan is far better and the distances far smaller.
This totally explains the discrepancy between what I'd heard and, well, this happening, since what I heard was part of a discussion about the US's renewable-energy problems.
Logged
I just want to be myself and I want you to love me for who I am.
Good Intentions
Registered user
Posts: 13882
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #57 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 12:49:07 PM »
The US
really
needs to improve its power distribution infrastructure, though, from what I've heard.
Logged
Andrew_TSKS
Registered user
Posts: 39426
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #58 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 12:55:58 PM »
You name a US infrastructure, we need to improve it. That was another way, in addition to massive deficit spending, that Ronald Reagan screwed future generations in the name of short-run prosperity. Infrastructure updates that were on a regular timetable from when Eisenhower created said infrastructures (think our interstate highway system) until Regan came into office were permanently put on hold under Reagan, and have never been restarted. Now we have a shitty obsolete power grid that causes rolling blackouts during California heatwaves and a shitty interstate highway system that causes bridges in Minnesota to collapse during rush hour. Whee.
Logged
I just want to be myself and I want you to love me for who I am.
elpollodiablo
Registered user
Posts: 32624
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #59 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 12:58:10 PM »
Huh. I'd never really heard that before. Makes sense, though.
Logged
think 'on the road.'
diesel_powered
Registered user
Posts: 19210
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #60 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 02:39:36 PM »
PRIVATE ENTERPRISE WILL FIX THAT YOU COMMIE BASTSRD! INVISIBLE HAND! INVISIBLE HAND!
Logged
Quote
she had me at "let's make a sandwich"
Antero
Registered user
Posts: 7526
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #61 on:
Nov 11, 2009, 07:46:50 PM »
See the market is going to ensure that resources are distributed most efficiently, so if the infrastructure seems broken
it's okay
because this is actually the most efficient infrastructure possible!
Leibniz ---> Friedman
Logged
Quote from: nonotyet
this has been OPINIONS IN CAPSLOCK
The_Tourist
Registered user
Posts: 2951
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #62 on:
Nov 12, 2009, 01:10:43 AM »
don't forget our hundred and something year old water system.
i swear a major pipe bursts in l.a. on a weekly basis these days.
Logged
we have the money for missiles and fun
Greg Nog
Registered user
Posts: 21629
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #63 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 02:51:28 PM »
Extremely gruesome pictures of a dude who got his finger crushed by magnets.
Quote
Like you smash a hammer on a frikandel (is a Dutch snack, a sort of minced-meat hot dog).
...
with every beat of my heart some blood was pushed out.
Logged
YojimboMonkey
Registered user
Posts: 12034
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #64 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 02:54:35 PM »
That is gross. Magnets Attack! is kind of cool though
Logged
Anus-licking causes sepsis; if not given antibiotics within a half hour, they perish.
C of heartbreak
Registered user
Posts: 5285
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #65 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 03:55:55 PM »
This website that I buy science stuff from used to have a horrifying cautionary tale about a kid who's hand was crushed by extremely powerful magnets, but they seem to have taken it down.
Logged
HOW WOULD I BE? WHAT WOULD I DO?
cold before sunrise
Registered user
Posts: 2500
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #66 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 05:59:44 PM »
attempting to locate articles testifying to the fear response in plants and how they are known to act as a community, proven by following the charcoal dyed isotopes from one plant to another as they feed and support one another, to beat on vegetarians a little... they've also found that mushrooms contain collagen, which puts them in the same league as animals. am sadly coming up empty handed although i've seen articles on the emotional - namely fear - responses of plants covered by both major science publications:
http://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2008-04/plants-and-powders
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=vegetables-contain-antibiotics
Logged
Riding a tidal wave of whiskey on a surfboard made out of don't care.
Bernard
Registered user
Posts: 9845
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #67 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 06:24:13 PM »
So I read the label on the baby's formula.
1st ingredient: corn syrup
2nd ingredient: vegetable oil
So, yeah. She's getting weaned off that shit ASAP, and I had better not get any resistance from anybody in this house.
Logged
Ha, see, and look how Julian Casablancas ended up!!!!
C of heartbreak
Registered user
Posts: 5285
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #68 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 06:32:56 PM »
I didn't know they made a baby version of Mountain Dew.
Logged
HOW WOULD I BE? WHAT WOULD I DO?
Bernard
Registered user
Posts: 9845
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #69 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 06:55:46 PM »
All it lacks are fizz and neon.
Logged
Ha, see, and look how Julian Casablancas ended up!!!!
clare
Registered user
Posts: 5192
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #70 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 07:38:06 PM »
Wow. Corn syrup as #1 ingredient? That's scary....good luck finding an alternative.
Logged
You must have a very long, thin, tapered penis.
jess
Registered user
Posts: 3571
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #71 on:
Dec 09, 2009, 09:07:04 PM »
Is it HFCS or just regular corn syrup?
I was curious about how the natural sugar content of milk, given that, and found out that human milk has about 7.5% lactose, which is more than cow milk (5%), but still I imagine way lower than formula that has corn syrup as a first ingredient. Also apparently the fact that lactose is less sweet than other sugars encourages babies to drink more milk and thus get more other nutrients including calcium, because I guess sweeter fluids (like milk dosed with glucose) satiate them more quickly or something? I only read about that from one website though, so who knows.
Logged
Bernard
Registered user
Posts: 9845
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #72 on:
Dec 10, 2009, 08:00:24 AM »
I don't have the can in front of me right now, but I think it's regular corn syrup -- I don't recall seeing 'high fructose' on the label. But then again I don't recall what I did five minutes ago, so.
Yeah, the funny thing is that I was talking to a mom friend and she was reassuring me that my baby would survive formula, telling me that when her husband was a baby they couldn't afford regular formula so they gave him powdered milk with karo syrup, and I thought that sounded like -- I don't know, like they treated a fever by bleeding him or something -- just kind of old-timey and awful. Then I was reading labels, trying to figure out the difference between two cans of Nutramigen.
Internet says:
Quote
Since Nutramigen comes in various forms (powder, concentrate and premixed), the actual makeup of the product will vary slightly. In powder form, you'll find the mixture made up of predominately (46 percent total) corn syrup solids, which are basically sugars produced through the dehydration of liquid corn syrup. The process of dehydration is initiated by introducing sulfur dioxide and other chemicals to the corn syrup. After corn syrup solids, the next ingredient is vegetable oil, coming in at about 25 percent and consisting of a mixture of palm, coconut, soy and sunflower oils. From there you'll find casein hydrolysate (essentially protein-reduced cow's milk) at 17 percent and modified corn starch at 7 percent. The rest of the ingredients come in at less than 2 percent of the composition and consist mostly of vitamins (A, D3, E, K1, B6 and B12).
Logged
Ha, see, and look how Julian Casablancas ended up!!!!
elpollodiablo
Registered user
Posts: 32624
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #73 on:
Dec 10, 2009, 08:09:07 AM »
Corn syrup makes stout-hearted Americans
Logged
think 'on the road.'
Bernard
Registered user
Posts: 9845
Re: Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
«
Reply #74 on:
Dec 10, 2009, 11:59:19 AM »
Well, I can see what they're going for -- sugars, fats, proteins, vitamins -- but dang. Some red food coloring, sugar, citric acid, and water thickened with gelatin is really not an acceptable substitute for a strawberry.
Logged
Ha, see, and look how Julian Casablancas ended up!!!!
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
5
6
7
8
...
15
LPTJ
|
Last Plane Forums
|
Departure Lounge
| Topic:
Woo-ha! Ain't science something?
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Last Plane Forums
-----------------------------
=> Last Plane
=> In The Earbuds
=> Departure Lounge
=> White Courtesy Phone
-----------------------------
Archives
-----------------------------
=> The Hangar
Loading...