*
*
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2013, 06:22:55 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search: Advanced search
655910 Posts in 9232 Topics by 3396 Members Latest Member: - vlozan86 Most online today: 20 - most online ever: 494 (Jul 01, 2007, 02:59:53 PM)
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Author Topic: LPTJ in pitchfork  (Read 2741 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Andrew_TSKS
Registered user

Posts: 39426


« Reply #25 on: Apr 12, 2005, 02:53:50 PM »

ohhhhh yeah. i've heard of that site.
Logged

I just want to be myself and I want you to love me for who I am.
JamesSchneider
Registered user

Posts: 1689


« Reply #26 on: Apr 12, 2005, 06:47:20 PM »

sorry to be unclear
Logged

Couldn't you take the second bus home?
elpollodiablo
Registered user

Posts: 32624


« Reply #27 on: Apr 12, 2005, 07:42:14 PM »

Thing is, any music 'journalism' (and the pfork people are journalists in the same way that Bill O'Reilly is a journalist) that includes arbitrary quanifications of a record's 'relevance' or 'quality' represented by a 1-10 scale is uniteresting to me. Oh, you've got a needlessly dense seven-paragraph treatise on the clime and culture of independent music--  touching tangentially how said record fits into that clime--that follows your 5.7 or your 7.2? Oh, well, that's justified. Nothing like the square media, say EW or USA Today, with their laughable alphabetical rating systems and terse, penetrable comments.
Fuckin' assholes.


And, yes, Andrew. You win.
Logged

think 'on the road.'
Andrew_TSKS
Registered user

Posts: 39426


« Reply #28 on: Apr 12, 2005, 08:33:47 PM »

actually, that's a really good point, elpollo. i'm a big fan of evaluating a record based on how much i dig the music on it, not on any larger relation to the state of music today blah blah etc etc. that kind of criticism does very little to tell me what records actually sound like. also, i think it reinforces the sort of musical cliquishness that's really popular today, where people condemn or praise records they've never listened to based solely on who already listens to those bands, or what bands/genres the band in question is associated with. if there's one thing i hate, it's when people do that kind of thing.
Logged

I just want to be myself and I want you to love me for who I am.
bYul
Registered user

Posts: 133


« Reply #29 on: Apr 12, 2005, 11:33:20 PM »

Quote from: "Andrew_TSKS"
i'm a big fan of evaluating a record based on how much i dig the music on it, not on any larger relation to the state of music today blah blah etc etc.
quote]


haha... that reminds of how buddyhead used to review music based on a five point scale of how stoked axl rose was about it.  That was genius, but sadly buddyhead no longer does reviews Mad
Logged

... somewhere safe and soft and without maggots
dieblucasdie
Registered user

Posts: 24493


« Reply #30 on: Apr 13, 2005, 01:58:39 AM »

Haha, well obviously you have to take the numerical reviews with a grain of salt.  It's a good general barometer though.  I have may done a similar post before, but my take on pfork trustworthness:

0.0-4.0 - They're probably right; it's probably pretty darn bad.
4.0-8.9 - This album could be great or it could suck.
9.0-10.0 - This album is probably pretty good.

Pitchforkmedia:  We Can Make Obvious Calls!
Logged

he was basically your only chance at making the world love you.
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
LPTJ | Last Plane Forums | Departure Lounge | Topic: LPTJ in pitchfork
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Board layout based on the Oxygen design by Bloc